On life…and learning

Blocked. Twitter, Roads…What Next?

with 2 comments

I am reading some crazy pieces of news these days! Are we in for another round of Emergency off late, albeit undeclared one? Or, are we readying ourselves for a Chinese takeover – India, a new China?

After the shocking order earlier this week to the social networking site twitter for banning the accounts of eminent journalists amongst several others, the Indian Government has now decided to shut down six prominent Metro-train stations around the Prime Minister’s and BJP President’s residences located in the Lutyen’s New Delhi, for most the Sunday, as a preventive and cautionary step in ensuring ‘public order’. One does not need to invoke a binomial theorem to add two and two of the true intentions – they don’t want the common man to reach the site for the Gherao, or protests, called tomorrow by the Anna Hazare supporters.

I recall how nattily the Delhi Metro organized, as a last moment decision, a ‘mock drill’, when these protests happened last time in Delhi. This mock-drill made traveling for the general public quite difficult. Routine matter; I heard Metro and Government spokespersons say then. Well, the informed public would surely know that it the same Metro Department that has a rule of notifying 20-days’ in advance in case such a mock drill is to be conducted!

In the August of 2011, when the Government was heavily up in arms against the protests of Anna and his supporters against corruption, Union minister Kapil Sibal quoted a Supreme Court judgment – “the right which flows from Article 19(1)(b) is not a right to hold a meeting at any place and time”.

Smart lawyer; that he is, Sibal. For he simply stopped short of stating the very next line of the same judgment, wherein the Apex court went on to stress that the State can only impose ‘reasonable’ restrictions in the interest of public order.’

Not only that, Sibal failed to state further portions of the Apex court’s ruling in the above case (Himat Lal K. Shah vs. Commissioner Of Police, Ahmedabad and Anr., 1973 AIR 87), wherein Hon. Justice Sikri said that “Freedom of assembly is an essential element of a democratic system. The basic assumption in a democratic polity is that government shall be based on the consent of the governed.”

The Supreme Court didn’t stop at this. It further emphasized that free consent implied discussions and the right of citizens to “meet face to face with others for the discussion of their ideas and problems, and public streets are the ‘natural’ places for expression of opinion and dissemination of ideas.”

It is ironic that in the capital of the world’s largest democracy, there is no room for public protest. Contrary to whatever Mr. Sibal may conveniently quote, under the Indian Constitution the right of people to visit the site to support the protest – which may be justified or unjustified – is well enshrined. It has been held that the right to hold a meeting or a demonstration involves the Constitutional right of every citizen – of assembly under Article 19(l)(b), of expression under Article 19(l)(a), and of free movement throughout the territory of India under Article 19(l)(d).

It is true that the aforesaid right u/A 19(I)(b) is subject to reasonable restrictions. Law can impose these restrictions when the sovereignty of India or public order is threatened. Having said that, it must be noted that these rights can be regulated only in specific circumstances and on grounds that are unexceptionable for protecting the sovereignty and integrity of India and maintaining public order.

It is also imperative to note that the Government must be extremely careful while refusing meetings on the ground of ‘public order’. The threat to ‘public order’ must not be read akin to a threat to ‘law and order’; for a threat to ‘public order’ can arise only when a total breakdown of the State machinery is looming. So, is our Government accepting that tomorrow’s protests will lead to a total collapse of the State and hence the restriction?

Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code permits the State to act when ‘immediate prevention or speedy remedy’ is desirable. But this can be done only after the State has provided all the relevant reasons. No order under this section can remain in force for more than two months.

However, we clearly observe from the events of last one year that a citizen’s right to organise a meeting, an assembly or a dissent demonstration is increasingly being breached upon. A protest demonstration is sought to be barred either by the imposition of prohibitionary orders in the area concerned or the relevant routes are not permitted. The Delhi Metro, clearly acting under the diktat of the Government, has just done that!

“Every company, whether it’s an entertainment company, or a construction company, or a social media company, has to operate within the laws of the given country”, said Sachin Pilot, a Minister of State for Communications and IT, justifying the government’s threat to twitter of an “appropriate and suitable action” if it failed to block offensive accounts as soon as possible.

I wonder; does Mr.Pilot know what the Constitution really says in this regard, or that he too is conveniently quoting the half-text like his senior colleague!

So, right from refusing permission to Anna last year for protests at the Jantar Mantar, to blocking down twitter accounts of journalists last week to shutting down the Metro stations now, the Government and its smart lawyer-turned-political-spokespersons have disregarded the Constitutional rights and simply imposed a new form of ‘Emergency’ on the common man.

Hope my Blog doesn’t get blocked after this…


Post Script: As per the newspapers reports, the funniest part was that Milind Deora, another Minister of State for Communications and Information Technology had got his account suspended for unknown reasons the very next day of his tweets! Ironically, he had used his tweets to defend the government’s actions!!

Photo-credit: mtholyoke.edu

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are author’s own and not of the organisation he is associated with.

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I have used the word “We” in this comment and please read it beyond you and me. We means a common group of people of preferably India.

    We are living in times when ‘Struggle’ is the buzz word. Common man is struggling for its rights, Nature is struggling to exist, poor is struggling for food (2 waqt ki roti) and many more forms of it.

    People have narrowed their limits. They have put boundaries on their belonging-ness. It is time when almost every other person prefers to stay on couch and writes about Nationalism on Social media.

    People who actually sweat it out in hot and humid weather are less, decreasing and will cease to exist in times to come. We are generally happy people within our circles so we don’t want to invite troubles.

    If we face an accident on road, we try to ignore it. If we gets to know that somebody is doing wrong then we are reluctant to advise him against it as we all have a guilt feeling of done something wrong somewhere. (I remember that song from Roti where Rajesh Khanna tells the crowd- Pehla pathar wo maare jisne paap na kia ho, jo paapi na ho… )

    So, inside everybody is a beast and we all carry two faces in our lives. We prefer to hide that negative one and try to portray Sanctimonious in public domain. This dual acting is landing us in the mess we actually are. We want to weed out corruption but we ourselves are too corrupt to do that. We portray ourselves as change agents but many times it comes out that change agents itself are Gain-seekers.

    So in short, Struggle is a word that has meaning for a section that is cornered. It exist and will keep existing for that group of Nationalist, Non-corrupt, honest brigade of India and world but for others, Struggle is news that comes and gets out of Short memory that public carries. They watch it on TV, listen on radio, read in newspapers but have no time, intent or courage to join that struggle.


    August 26, 2012 at 3:10 AM

    • Well written. Thank you.
      Your comment reminds me of what Dewey said, “While the saints are engaged in introspection, the world is run by the burly sinners.”
      Let we – you and I – be the change.


      August 26, 2012 at 9:18 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: